Catalogue entry no. 66 by William W. Robinson:
Frans Pourbus the Elder first studied with his father, Pieter Pourbus (1523–1584), a Bruges painter of biblical pictures and portraits. From about 1564, he was completing his training in Antwerp with Frans Floris I (1519/20–1570), the leading artist in the Netherlands during the middle of the sixteenth century. Karel van Mander, who met Pourbus around 1566, greatly admired his paintings and regarded him as the finest journeyman to emerge from Floris’s large workshop. “He made many beautiful and prominent works,” wrote Van Mander, “and outstandingly good portraits in which he had a particularly beautiful and pleasant method and manner of working.”
Pourbus’s earliest dated pictures are from 1567 and 1568. In a career of less than fifteen years, he created a substantial oeuvre of portraits, altarpieces, and religious narratives that justifies Van Mander’s high opinion of his paintings. Only six drawings can be attributed to him. Three are signed, and three bear old, presumably reliable inscriptions of the artist’s name. All are strikingly different from each other in their handling, subjects, functions, and choices of media. If we add to those few surviving sheets the lost or unidentified black-chalk study of the Duke of Alençon cited in Pourbus’s estate inventory, we are confronted with a disparate and lamentably incomplete representation of his draftsmanship.
The Harvard drawing is a mature work by Pourbus, produced in the year before his death at the age of thirty-five or thirty-six. The autograph monogram and date, as well as its fully resolved design and tidy execution, indicate that it is very likely a finished work of art intended for sale or a gift to a collector or patron. Another finished composition by the artist from the same year, Christ Blessing the Little Children (Fig. 1), is identically monogrammed and dated, but carried out in brown ink and brown wash and in a different technique, which was inspired by Venetian models.
In several respects, the Harvard drawing is a characteristic work of the Floris circle. Its upright oval format and composition dominated by a single figure seated before a landscape occur in engravings designed by Floris. The combination of two shades of reddish brown wash and white opaque watercolor, which lends a pictorial flair to the drawing, is also found in a drawing by Floris, and impressions of two chiaroscuro woodcuts after his design are printed with reddish brown or pink tone blocks. Pourbus’s application of highlights in white opaque watercolor on the contours of forms, as well as in the interior modeling, also derives from finished drawings by Floris and other artists in his circle, although Pourbus’s handling is more refined than that of his teacher.
When the drawing first came to light on the art market in 1972, it was already entitled King Nebuchadnezzar Besieging Jerusalem, but there is no record of when or why the subject was identified as such. The Babylonian ruler Nebuchadnezzar II conquered the city in 599–97 BCE and again in 586 BCE, when it was destroyed and the temple burned (II Kings 25:1–17). While Pourbus’s drawing probably does represent Nebuchadnezzar as the conqueror of Jerusalem, it is a rare—or even unique—illustration of the subject from the period. The few sixteenth-century Netherlandish images of Nebuchadnezzar illustrate other biblical texts, and most depict the Babylonian king with a long, full beard. Yet neither his facial hair nor the Roman battle dress disqualifies him as the subject of the Harvard drawing. Prints published in Antwerp in 1585 in Gerard de Jode’s Thesaurus sacrarum historiarum veteris testamenti depict ancient Near Eastern rulers from various cultures dressed as Roman warriors. An engraving published by De Jode after a design attributed to Jan Snellinck features King Zedekiah, the defeated Jewish ruler of Jerusalem when it was taken by Nebuchadnezzar (Fig. 2). Looking very much like the figure in the Harvard composition, he stands before the burning city, his scepter on the ground, while on the road below he and other captives are led away. In Pourbus’s drawing, the same figure type and costume may well stand for Zedekiah’s antagonist, Nebuchadnezzar. It has been conjectured that the Harvard drawing and other images of the Babylonian king from the 1560s, ’70s, and ’80s should be interpreted as “disguised criticism of Spanish rule” that equates the Babylonian king’s oppression of the Jews with the mistreatment by agents of the Habsburg monarchy of their subjects in the Netherlands.
Notes